PALO ALTO, CALIF. -- Basex chief analyst Jonathan Spira wants to make one thing clear to people who think it's more effective to juggle multiple tasks at once:
"There's no such thing as multitasking," Spira said. "We're switching between tasks, but we [human beings] are not capable of multitasking."
The comments came during a recent panel discussion here, dubbed "Silicon Valley Fights Back Against the (Information) Monster it Created" and sponsored by the Churchill Club, a regional business and technology organization.
Spira's point is more than semantic. The thinking is that when someone stops working on a document to answer the phone or respond to an e-mail, the original task is interrupted -- not handled simultaneously.
More significantly, Spira said his firm's research indicates that the time lost "recovering" from interruptions may be worse than the interruption itself.
For instance, when interrupted by a phone call, e-mail or other distraction, the time needed to get back to where you left off on your original task could take from ten to twenty times longer than the interruption.
Not surprisingly, those lost minutes add up: Basex estimates knowledge workers lose about two hours a day to interruptions, costing the economy hundreds of billions of dollars a year in lost productivity.
Part of the problem can be blamed on the very technology that's supposedly making us more productive. Cell phones, instant messages, e-mail and the like have all conspired to create unprecedented, unmanageable levels of information overload.
With one notable exception, the experts gathered for the "Silicon Valley Fights Back Against the (Information) Monster it Created" panel agreed the constant flow of information and interruptions are a serious problem.
But John Poisson, founder and CEO of Tiny Pictures, said he disagreed with the premise that there's a serious information overload problem.
"Saying there's too much information is like saying there's too much food at the buffet," Poisson said. "Just stop and manage it."