To some data center mangers, it seems like they are turning more and more into a facility head. The only matters they seem to hear about are power, cooling and floor space problems.
A new report by Gabriel Consulting Group (GCG) of Beaverton, OR, indicates that the biggest concerns these days are overall electrical capacity, closely followed by a lack of data center floor space. And they dont expect to see any light at the end of the tunnel any time soon.
Close to three quarters of the respondents expect facilities concerns to become an even larger purchasing decision factor in the coming year.
More than half of respondents in our survey indicate that data center facilities (power, cooling and floor space) heavily influence their server choices, said Dan Olds, an analyst at GCG. Given the massive growth in IT infrastructures over the last 20 years, its easy to see how IT facilities consumption has become a large line item on the expense side of the ledger.
Instead of their former separation, the survey found that many data center managers and facilities managers now work in a much closer partnership. Unlike the old days when electricity was simply taken for granted, more than half of data center managers have become financially responsible for their use of energy and the amount of real estate they take up. This, said Olds, puts the onus on them to minimize expenses through better IT management and more efficient equipment.
Bill Moran, an analyst with Ptak, Noel and Associates, says that the rise in importance in power and cooling is helping stage a revival in mainframe computing. Pronounced dead many times, the mainframe has been holding its own in recent years and is currently undergoing something of an upsurge. Reason: the mainframe can bring about a big saving in energy costs.
You can consolidate lots of Linux instances into one large mainframe which takes up far less space than a comparable collection of Windows servers, said Moran.
Consolidation onto the mainframe can drive significant drops in power and cooling bills.
Vendor Differentiation?Not surprisingly, all the big server vendors are placing heavy emphasis on the energy efficiency, compactness and power monitoring of their latest gear. All the big OEMs are constantly promoting such innovations as chips that use less far energy, form factors that take up less room, and virtualization technologies that eliminate vast banks of aging equipment, thereby shrinking the data center footprint.
Despite major PR and marketing campaign, though, such messaging is largely falling on deaf ears. Users dont seem to believe that any one vendor is better in this arena than the competition.
Users really dont see a clear leader in terms of system energy efficiency, said Olds.
The answer no difference between vendors, actually garnered three times more votes than the highest scoring of the server OEMs, which was HP. The GCG survey found that when you tallied No Difference with Not Sure, you ended up with 61% of the overall total with regards to energy efficiency.
Nor do users see any clear leader on when it comes to system density. Close to 60% of respondents said there was no difference in vendor offerings in this area, or that they didnt know which vendor could jam the most systems into the smallest space.
Every vendor has their own unique power management offering, but none of them has shown the ability to step up and grab the high ground on this feature, said Olds. Close to 70% of our survey respondents dont see any of the vendors assuming the role of facilities leader.
One Vendors Fits All?What about the premise that one all-encompassing vendor that offers soup-to-nuts services like a converged infrastructure to combine data, storage and networking within one server-blade based infrastructure can slash power, cooling and cabling cost?